Comparison of online dating services Free webcam sex broadcasting
(charged .95 per month when it launched in 1995.) e Harmony, launched in 2000 and marketed toward people seeking long-term relationships, blazed a trail with its prices, charging some of the highest in the industry, says Mark Brooks, a dating-industry analyst and the editor of Online Personals Watch.Of course, there was a business reason for charging low rates in the early days, some experts say: Sites needed to stock the sea of love with fish.Indeed, for online purveyors of love, business is booming.While people used to meet mostly through friends, says Reuben J.The faster they attracted users, the more useful the sites would be, Brooks says.And paying fees, he says, can have an upside: People may be more likely to actually use a site if they pay for it.
But most subscription sites automatically renew until the customer cancels, and those fees can add up.
100% Free Dating Sites and Division by Zero: For simplicity, we arbitrarily set the people/dollar value of 100% free dating sites to the total number of people/month (since that is the most people you will get out of the site regardless of how little you pay). The birth of this site was fueled primarily by red wine, single malt scotch, loud music and copious amounts of caffeine.
Mathematicians may argue that the value should be “infinite” (and they would probably be right). By the time we realized the sheer “groanerosity” of that particular pun, it was too late.
Cons: Distorted or fuzzy images; unattractive website.
Pros: Costs nothing; easy to use; has a huge pool of people to flirt and connect with; boasts 120,000 marriages a year.
So perhaps it should come as no surprise that as the popularity of online dating has risen, so have prices.